Procurement has its share of buzzwords - RFPs, RFIs, tail spend, cost avoidance, TCO, and of course, the trusty eAuction. But one of the most useful distinctions in sourcing is the one between direct and indirect spend. Too often, eAuctions are associated only the tail spend. In reality, they can unlock value across both direct and indirect categories - just in very different ways.

Let’s break down how spend types differ, and why eAuctions are a natural fit for each.

Direct vs. Indirect Spend: A Quick Refresher

• Direct spend: Inputs that directly contribute to your product or service delivered to customers. Think: steel for automotive, billable subcontractor hours in consulting, or concrete in construction. It’s typically large in volume, structured, and closely tied to production schedules.
• Indirect spend: The goods and services that keep the business running but don’t flow directly into the product. Think: IT software, HR services, MRO supplies, facilities maintenance, and employee benefits. It’s often fragmented, less visible, and more service-heavy.

Both are critical. Both are expensive. And both can benefit from structured competitive bidding.

Why eAuctions Work for Direct Spend?

Direct spend is the traditional home turf of eAuctions. Why?

• Volume and clarity: Buyers usually know what they need and how much of it, which makes creating precise bid lots straightforward.
• Supplier leverage: Direct inputs are core to the business, so there’s usually a robust supply market.
• Standardization: Many direct categories (raw materials, components, freight lanes) are easier to compare apples-to-apples.
• Urgency: Delays in direct supply can stop production lines - auctions give real-time clarity and speed to decision-making.

With well-structured lots and specs, eAuctions in direct spend often generate double-digit savings because suppliers are motivated to win volume.

Why eAuctions Work for Indirect Spend?

Indirect spend is where many organizations leave money on the table. Categories are messy, stakeholders resist change, and suppliers tend to set terms on their timeline. This is exactly why eAuctions are powerful here:

• Transparency: Auctions turn vague, relationship-driven buys into structured competitions.
• Engagement: Stakeholders get to see live market dynamics instead of opaque negotiations.
• Service categories: Even complex buys (IT services, benefits administration, consulting) can be auctioned once requirements are framed clearly.
• Challenging the incumbent: Many indirect suppliers rely on inertia. Auctions force them to prove their competitiveness.

Indirect auctions may not always yield the same volume-based savings as direct, but they often drive total value - better service levels, improved contract terms, and fresh competition.

Different Spend, Same Tool - But Different Setups

The art is in how the auction is designed:

• Direct auctions: Best suited for highly standardized, spec-driven categories with predictable demand. Reverse auctions (price goes down as suppliers compete) are often the weapon of choice.
• Indirect auctions: Best when requirements can be packaged into clear bundles - think facilities services or IT hardware refreshes. Multi-parameter auctions (price + service + innovation) can help stakeholders balance cost and quality.

Done right, both types unlock value - just through different levers.

Why This Matters

Direct vs. indirect isn’t just jargon. It’s a lens for how procurement creates value - and how eAuctions amplify that value. Direct spend auctions keep production flowing efficiently and cost-effectively. Indirect spend auctions shine a light into neglected corners of the P&L and reset supplier dynamics.

The biggest myth to bust? That eAuctions only work in one spend type. The truth: eAuctions are flexible, adaptable, and effective across both.

‍